All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: Really slow netstat and /proc/net/tcp in 2.4
Date: 12 Oct 2001 21:56:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <k2sncok4z2.fsf@zero.aec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011011114736.A13722@netnation.com> <200110111930.XAA28404@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20011011125538.C10868@netnation.com>
In-Reply-To: Simon Kirby's message of "Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:55:38 -0700"

In article <20011011125538.C10868@netnation.com>,
Simon Kirby <sim@netnation.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 11:30:25PM +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
>> Hello!
>> 
>> > Is there something that changed from 2.2 -> 2.4 with regards to the
>> > speed of netstat and /proc/net/tcp?
>> 
>> Incredibly high size of hash table, I think.
>> At least here size is ~1MB. And all this is read each 1K of data read
>> via /proc/ :-)

> So it's walking the hash table per block read, and the hash table is very
> large?  Hmm.  I notice it's a bit faster if I use dd if=/proc/net/tcp
> of=/dev/null bs=1024k, but not much.

> Is it possible to fix this?  Was the 2.2 hash table just that much
> smaller?

The hash table is likely to big anyways; eating cache and not helping that
much. If you're interested in some testing
I can send you patches to change it by hand and collect statistics for
average hash queue length. Then you can figure out a good size for your
workload with some work. Longer time I think the table sizing heuristics
are far too aggressive and need to be throttled back; but that needs more
data from real servers.

-Andi


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-12 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-11 18:47 Really slow netstat and /proc/net/tcp in 2.4 Simon Kirby
2001-10-11 19:30 ` kuznet
2001-10-11 19:55   ` Simon Kirby
2001-10-12 16:44     ` kuznet
2001-10-12 19:36       ` Simon Kirby
2001-10-12 19:43         ` kuznet
2001-10-12 19:56     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2001-10-12 22:10       ` Simon Kirby
2001-10-12 23:57         ` Andi Kleen
2001-10-13 15:07           ` Hugh Dickins
2001-10-13 16:07             ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=k2sncok4z2.fsf@zero.aec.at \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sim@netnation.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.