From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRLJO-0003TI-WA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:09:19 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRL6V-0004pw-1I for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:55:59 +0200 Received: from ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl ([77.162.165.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:55:59 +0200 Received: from koen by ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:55:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:55:47 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Subject: yocto 1.3 branch for meta-openembedded layers, RFC wanted. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:09:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, We need a branch to track oe-core 'danny' and I am swamped till ELC-E happens, so I would like to hold off on patches that make meta-oe layers incompatible with oe-core 'danny'. As for branch maintenance: any volunteers for managing the meta-openembedded 'danny' branches? There doesn't need to be a single maintainer, but it would be nice to have one person coordinating everything, even if it's just pulling in danny-next branches from the layer maintainers every week or so. As I said above, I'm swamped for the next 3 weeks, so can people who have used or are using the 'denzil' branch weigh in with feedback/anecdotes/etc? I have such a document for oe-core 'denzil', which I keep failing to send out, but it boils down to "better predictability for merge windows". Please share your experience for meta-oe here. regards, Koen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFQiRqzMkyGM64RGpERAschAJ98yscNYLI9qNGRviDm+drBquLttACgoa0X /YhGdFr+iYLy8n99sXb4zKE= =ahtL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----