From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRW5c-0001UO-6S for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:39:48 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRVsg-0003aA-DS for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:26:26 +0200 Received: from ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl ([77.162.165.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:26:26 +0200 Received: from koen by ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:26:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Subject: Re: [meta-browser] Question regarding status of chromium recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:39:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 25-10-12 20:01, Chris Larson schreef: > Greetings, > > I'm wondering if the chromium recipes in this layer have ever been build > tested. As far as I can tell, both 19 and 20 are missing dependencies on > udev (libudev), gtk+, and gconf, and 20 also wants the openssl headers. > 19 also fails due to an attempt to build/link a native tool requiring > libxi, so it seems it can't be built without x11 headers on the build > machine (along with the odd ld.gold requirement). Given these issues, I > figured I'd throw out a contact email and try to determine if perhaps the > OSSystems folks have local changes that never made it into the public > layer, or if the recipes just didn't get a great deal of testing. > > Thanks, I'd appreciate any input on their status :) Nice timing, I just received a request for a working chromium build and I ran into similar if not the same issues :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFQibx8MkyGM64RGpERAuWWAJ9ooRxIMeMmyWCAT5gCkfYjrx05NwCgso/G hWVMQT8AZkx2MOXqsr+xARc= =2i+V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----