From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Massimo Del Fedele Subject: Re: Fix for Asus G75 notebook subwoofer Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:57:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A5726523F for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:57:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVeyk-0007bS-3X for alsa-devel@alsa-project.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:57:50 +0100 Received: from host118-251-dynamic.0-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it ([87.0.251.118]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:57:50 +0100 Received: from max by host118-251-dynamic.0-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:57:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Il 06/11/2012 09:36, Takashi Iwai ha scritto: > At Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:49:39 +0100, > Massimo Del Fedele wrote: >> > > You meant 0x3e instead of 0x1e in the comment above, right? Yep, sorry, it was 0x3e of course > > > Other than that, the default pin configurations could be easily > implemented via fixups. Take a look at patch_conexant.c. thank you, I'll look at it. Is it possible to "connect" the fixups to the asus g75 ? > > In anyway, it'd be helpful if you can attach the alsa-info.sh output > on your machine. Even better would be results before and after the > patch. > The unpatched info is already on bug report : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1045981 (comment #7) I'll add the patched one now. BTW, did you see the above patch (error in via_auto_fill_dac_nids) ? My patch isn't correct either (fails when the 'continue' path is taken) but it's better than now. I guess that code should be rewritten, it's quite weird in respect to dac numbering. > > thanks, > > Takashi > Thank you Massimo