From: "Joachim Schmitz" <jojo@schmitz-digital.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: erratic behavior commit --allow-empty
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:26:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <kd669a$q15$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: alpine.LNX.2.01.1301121927350.15558@nerf07.vanv.qr
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2012-10-02 10:26, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>>
>> Note that git commit -m A --allow-empty *DID* create a commit. Only,
>> that it received the same name (SHA1) as the commit you created
>> before it because it had the exact same contents (files, parents,
>> author, committer, and timestamps). Obviously, your script was
>> executed sufficiently fast that the two commits happend in the same
>> second.
>
> What about introducing nanosecond-granular timestamps into Git?
Not every platform (supported by git) does have a nanosecond clock
resolution
Bye, Jojo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-02 7:51 erratic behavior commit --allow-empty Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-02 8:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-02 8:49 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-02 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-02 19:34 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-02 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-02 21:56 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 2:10 ` PJ Weisberg
2012-10-03 5:37 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-03 6:22 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 6:27 ` Johannes Sixt
[not found] ` <CAB9Jk9AgtNQfWDr31CWbXf2ag=11du-aruu-0+nOZ3KaaG9=og@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-03 7:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-10-03 7:35 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 20:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-10-03 7:29 ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-03 7:45 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 8:04 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-10-03 8:24 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 11:07 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-10-03 11:52 ` Angelo Borsotti
[not found] ` <CABURp0oHez6j8+FPG8Zm52TGVyC1XwWhE55TBDrXRGFrW6kWww@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-03 13:35 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 14:15 ` Phil Hord
2012-10-03 13:57 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-10-03 14:46 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 14:52 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-10-03 22:32 ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-04 7:07 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-04 13:24 ` Phil Hord
2012-10-04 19:00 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-04 21:17 ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-04 22:09 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-04 22:42 ` Philip Oakley
2012-10-04 23:10 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 12:25 ` Tomas Carnecky
2012-10-03 13:08 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 10:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-03 11:37 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 13:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-03 14:37 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 16:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-03 17:37 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 19:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-03 19:11 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 20:30 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-03 12:59 ` Phil Hord
2012-10-03 14:25 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 16:06 ` PJ Weisberg
2012-10-03 17:34 ` Angelo Borsotti
2012-10-03 19:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-10-03 19:43 ` PJ Weisberg
2012-10-05 8:15 ` Lars Noschinski
2013-01-12 18:30 ` Jan Engelhardt
2013-01-16 12:26 ` Joachim Schmitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='kd669a$q15$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=jojo@schmitz-digital.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.