From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U0YNz-0000vQ-Bd for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:11:35 +0100 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U0Y96-0001B6-Nh for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:56:12 +0100 Received: from ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl ([77.162.165.174]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:56:12 +0100 Received: from koen by ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:56:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org From: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1359539418-6925-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip4da2a5ae.direct-adsl.nl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: <1359539418-6925-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Subject: Re: [meta-oe][[RFC][PATCHv2] nodejs: add 0.8.18 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:11:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 30-01-13 10:50, Koen Kooi schreef: > The hardfp patch is a forward port from the 0.6.x version in meta-oe, the > upstream version doesn't work. I don't know why __SOFTFP__ isn't getting > defined, but checking for the PCS version of VFP is a lot safer and > actually works. > > Runtime tested on armv7a/angstrom Should node also drag in dependencies that npm *might* need for some packages? I've come across npm packages that need 'git' and 'python-compiler', should I add those to RRECOMMENDS_${PN}? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFRCSZiMkyGM64RGpERAotmAJ0WeNvsakI9gE4ftDE4sUnumRBzIwCgr6PS R/2Uo7V+JOAItM1a9kTaIUc= =mMcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----