All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bardur Arantsson <spam@scientician.net>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Another defrag question
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:58:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <kg61p4$jsi$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51265DB0.2060407@petaramesh.org>

On 02/21/2013 06:47 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
> Le 21/02/2013 18:25, Hugo Mills a écrit :
>> Correct. But btrfs isn't at that stage yet. It's getting visibly
>> closer, but it's not quite there. Hence the very strong recommendation
>> to keep up with the latest code. Hugo. 
> 
> The matter is that BTRFS had many early adopters just because it is -
> and has been for long now - in the mainline Linux kernel, so supposed
> stable and good choice for the future.
> 
> To be honest (and not wanting to troll, promised) this is the only
> single reason for which I use BTRFS on 5 of my 6 machines at home - just
> because I thought that "Just upgrade the distro every 6 months and it
> will become better and better over time, no hassle, make my life easy".
> 

Unfortunately many distros don't make it obvious, but Btrfs is still
hidden behind a giant EXPERIMENTAL label in the kernel configuration.

Regards,



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-21 15:46 Another defrag question Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 15:50 ` Liu Bo
2013-02-21 15:55   ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 15:54 ` Calvin Walton
2013-02-21 16:01   ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 16:09     ` Blair Zajac
2013-02-21 16:38     ` Hugo Mills
2013-02-21 17:03       ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 17:25         ` Hugo Mills
2013-02-21 17:47           ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2013-02-21 20:46             ` Hugo Mills
2013-02-21 20:58             ` Bardur Arantsson [this message]
2013-02-21 21:56               ` David Sterba
2013-02-22  5:55                 ` Bardur Arantsson
2013-02-21 21:31             ` Johannes Hirte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='kg61p4$jsi$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=spam@scientician.net \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.