From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCFAE0140A for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UHeAN-0003QE-DI for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:48:11 +0100 Received: from 24-196-194-18.static.hckr.nc.charter.com ([24.196.194.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:48:11 +0100 Received: from kurtmyles by 24-196-194-18.static.hckr.nc.charter.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:48:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: "Kurt Stevens" Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:48:08 -0400 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24-196-194-18.static.hckr.nc.charter.com X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130318-0, 03/18/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: How to script HOB settings X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:47:52 -0000 Hello, I have been building images using HOB, and that works very well. I had read in the docs about creating a custom package group, and I did this, and it worked well until I needed to incorporate some openembedded layers. After that my custom package group is either being ignored or overridden. I am having to select multiple perl libraries and system utilities for my package, and this is not only error prone and tedious, but I really want to keep these settings in a way that I can reapply them easily. I expect to use the same setup in the future on a different architecture, and having a layer or script that I can apply which works like the custom package group originally did would be great. I would appreciate any ideas, Thanks, Kurt Stevens