From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40788 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751846Ab3LMTod (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:44:33 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrYf0-0006wb-RG for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:44:30 +0100 Received: from cpc21-stap10-2-0-cust974.12-2.cable.virginm.net ([86.0.163.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:44:30 +0100 Received: from m_btrfs by cpc21-stap10-2-0-cust974.12-2.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 20:44:30 +0100 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Martin Subject: btrfs-send-receive vs rsync for (incremental/full) backups Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:44:16 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: OK... So for backing up across a local network to a second physical host... Is btrfs-send-receive stable enough now to be used? How does send-receive compare to using rsync for backups? Any comments please from those using such things? Thanks, Martin