Re: [PATCH v3] uapi/linux/fcntl: remove AT_RENAME* macros

[Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>]

* Randy Dunlap:

> On 9/4/25 11:49 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Amir Goldstein:
>> 
>>> I find this end result a bit odd, but I don't want to suggest another variant
>>> I already proposed one in v2 review [1] that maybe you did not like.
>>> It's fine.
>>> I'll let Aleksa and Christian chime in to decide on if and how they want this
>>> comment to look or if we should just delete these definitions and be done with
>>> this episode.
>> 
>> We should fix the definition in glibc to be identical token-wise to the
>> kernel's.
>
> That's probably a good suggestion...
> while I tried the reverse of that and Amir opposed.

It's certainly odd that the kernel uses different token sequences for
defining AT_RENAME_* and RENAME_*.  But it's probably too late to fix
that.

Here's the glibc patch:

  [PATCH] libio: Define AT_RENAME_* with the same tokens as Linux
  <https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/lhubjnpv03o.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com/T/#u>

Thanks,
Florian