From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 4ADC9E0073A; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:25:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (auslands-kv[at]gmx.de) * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Received: from plane.gmane.org (unknown [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB606E00478 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WimfX-0001rX-6Y for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 17:25:03 +0200 Received: from 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.32.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 17:25:03 +0200 Received: from auslands-kv by 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 17:25:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: Neuer User Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 17:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <536CADD1.1040402@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: replace udhcpc X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 15:25:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Great, then I will remove it. My app does not run as root, but all system configuration tasks are only available for root on my system. Am 09.05.2014 17:22, schrieb Burton, Ross: > On 9 May 2014 16:15, Neuer User wrote: >> Do you by chance know, why it depends on the xuser-account package? I >> don't want any additional user accounts on my system. If it is not >> essential I would remove it. > > If you're applications are running as root then you can remove the > dependency on that package and the patch that changes the security > policy. The reasoning is complicated but basically so that the "user" > can manipulate the network settings. > > Ross >