From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HoGDF-0000RE-D0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 05:54:31 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HoGDD-00043y-BE for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 11:54:27 +0200 Received: from office.ubiquisys.com ([88.96.204.222]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 11:54:27 +0200 Received: from mw_phil by office.ubiquisys.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 11:54:27 +0200 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: MikeW Subject: Re: When to use mtd.h or mtd-user.h Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MikeW yahoo.co.uk> writes: > > I note some applications for running in userspace say: > #include > and some say > #include > > Which is the recommended usage, and why ? > > Many thanks, > MikeW Incidentally, I did actually realise which was the *correct* usage, but I wondered why anyone (especially uBoot) would use the other. Thanks for the comments, MikeW