Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] deny push to current branch of non-bare repo

[Mark Burton <markb@ordern.com>]

Jeff King <peff <at> peff.net> writes:

> 
> The short of it is that it's dangerous, we see people confused by it
> (there was another one just yesterday), and it's a FAQ:
> 
>   http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitFaq#head-b96f48bc9c925074be9f95c0fce69bcece5f6e73
> 
> The FAQ even says "don't do this until you know what you are doing." So
> the safety valve is configurable, so that those who know what they are
> doing can switch it off.

When I first tried to use git I was bitten by exactly this problem. I know,
RTFM, but when everything is new, it's easy to undervalue the words of wisdom
when you don't understand the bigger picture and the rational behind the advice.

I now happily work with non-bare repositories on my main machine that I push to
from my satellite development machines but, of course, I don't push to the head
branches but, instead, to remote branches and then merge on the main machine.

I wouldn't have wasted as much time getting my head around this if git had
refused to accept the push to the current branch but, instead, issued a suitable
message telling me I probably didn't want to be doing that.

So, from my own experience, I would say this would be a good feature to add.

Cheers,

Mark