From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Raible Subject: Re: Git in next is broken Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4AFC8960.9090808@lsrfire.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 13 21:21:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N92dy-0002TM-6E for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:21:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757356AbZKMUVH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:21:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757336AbZKMUVG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:21:06 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45971 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757320AbZKMUVE (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:21:04 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N92dq-0002Q7-0L for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:21:10 +0100 Received: from adsl-63-197-71-184.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.197.71.184]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:21:09 +0100 Received: from raible by adsl-63-197-71-184.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:21:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 63.197.71.184 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.27 Safari/532.0) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre fluxnic.net> writes: > diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c > > index 4f9f0cc..6195a58 100644 > > --- a/remote.c > > +++ b/remote.c > > @@ -754,6 +754,8 @@ void ref_remove_duplicates(struct ref *ref_map) > > prev->next = ref_map->next; > > free(ref_map->peer_ref); > > free(ref_map); > > + ref_map = prev; // Keep the same prev. > > + continue; > > } > > This is one of those example where the comment is essentially useless. Wouldn't something like "// Skip the freed item" be more useful? - Eric