From: seno <senada@t-online.de>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RTL 8187b - naughty behaviour
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 20:12:44 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20100514T211527-88@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4BE30879.4020008@lwfinger.net
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...> writes:
> I do not understand the poor performance. I have a device with the
> rtl8187b chip - USB IDs 0bda:8187. That is an ID for an rtl8187, but it
> does have the B chip. I use tcpperf to measure the transmit speed. At 2
> m from the AP with an indicated signal of -17 dBm, my throughput is 13
> Mb/s. At 10 m with a signal of -49 dBm, the transmit speed is 3.5 Mb/s.
> On the download using speedtest.net, I got 11.3 Mb/s at 2 m, and 2.64 at
> 10 m. I got 0.49 Mb/s upload at both distances as that is the speed of
> my line.
>
> What happens if you use iwconfig to force a particular rate? At what
> setting is your throughput maximized. I don't think there is a problem
> with the rate setting mechanism, but that would test it.
>
> Larry
Hello,
it turns out that terms 'poor' or 'slow' performance on 8187b chipsets need to
be discussed more in detail.
If I would have never had a faster network, I would possibly not notice those
performance downturns.
I did some test on my notebook, once with mandriva 2010.0 and once with win 7.
The results:
windows:
@ 2 meters distance
rate : 54M
dBm : -46
speedtest: 9.9/0.98 Mbit/s (down/up)
DL file*: ~2.5 MByte/s
@ 10 meters distance
rate : 54M
dBm : -64
speedtest: 9.9/0.97 Mbit/s (down/up)
DL file*: ~1.25 MByte/s
linux:
@ 2 meters distance
rate : 36M
dBm : -30
speedtest: 9.9/1.00 Mbit/s (down/up)
DL file*: ~1.5 MByte/s
tcpperf output: 11769623 b/s (11769.62 kb/s 11.77 Mbit/s)
@ 10 meters distance
rate : 18M
dBm : -45
speedtest: 1.2/0.85 Mbit/s (down/up)
Dl file*: ~130 KByte/s (<---!!)
tcpperf output: 3663403 b/s (3663.40 kb/s 3.66 Mbit/s)
Dl file* = copy large file from a machine which is connected via 100mbit
ethernet to the router.
I did all tests several times to make sure to not report some random results.
Before I used pid algorithm as someone described above, but could not notice
any difference in network behavior.
If rate is set to auto, it _sometimes_ (~ twice a day) happens that connection
is up and iwconfig shows a rate of 24M, but I can not even ping the router.
Same happens if I set a fixed rate of 36 or 18, but it happens more often
(every 15 min) that the connection is up but no traffic is possible at all.
A fixed rate of 5.5M gives the most stable connection although the wireless
speed is as slow @ 10 meters with auto rate (130 KByte/s is FAR from 5.5M)
The rate settings apply to 10 meters distance, which is my typical situation
here at home.
On another PC with zw1211 wireless I set rate to 54M some time ago and there
the trick did it, connection is perfect and very fast.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-03 13:56 RTL 8187b - naughty behaviour Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-03 16:00 ` Larry Finger
2010-04-03 16:49 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-03 16:58 ` Larry Finger
2010-04-03 17:00 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-03 17:04 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-03 17:33 ` Larry Finger
2010-04-03 17:52 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-10 12:07 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-10 18:50 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-04-10 19:40 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-11 13:35 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-04-22 20:45 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-23 20:16 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-04-24 10:47 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-24 13:59 ` Larry Finger
2010-06-03 15:40 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-08-08 22:22 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-08-09 1:43 ` Larry Finger
2010-08-11 0:03 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-08-11 0:23 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-08-11 2:51 ` Larry Finger
2010-04-04 0:20 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2010-04-05 0:53 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-05 1:50 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-04-05 3:12 ` Rogerio Luz Coelho
2010-04-05 3:43 ` Gábor Stefanik
2010-04-03 20:03 ` Gus Wirth
2010-04-03 21:40 ` Larry Finger
2010-05-06 17:36 ` seno
2010-05-06 18:20 ` Larry Finger
2010-05-14 20:12 ` seno [this message]
2010-05-14 20:20 ` seno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20100514T211527-88@post.gmane.org \
--to=senada@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.