From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Witzel Subject: Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39 Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4E026FD4.7020606@podzimek.org> <1308793398-sup-9234@shiny> <20110623195409.GA21007@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> <4E03E8B8.9080500@podzimek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: List-ID: Thanks for the reply, Copied the patch from the "diff" line onwards and patched against a fresh kernel 2.6.39-r1 and r2 tree with same result: localhost linux # patch --dry-run --verbose -p1 < disk-io.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |index c650a1d..53e330e 100644 |--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c -------------------------- Patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 281. Hunk #2 succeeded at 296. Hunk #3 succeeded at 328. Hunk #4 succeeded at 338. Hunk #5 succeeded at 360. Hunk #6 succeeded at 2012. Hunk #7 succeeded at 2631. done same problem. Any other ideas would be great Dan Witzel