From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58671 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757247Ab2FOUKe (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:10:34 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sfcqi-000546-HB for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:10:28 +0200 Received: from mail1.co.dona-ana.nm.us ([67.134.23.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:10:28 +0200 Received: from steamraven by mail1.co.dona-ana.nm.us with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:10:28 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: steamraven Subject: Re: KVM on top of BTRFS Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1339456922.32583.YahooMailNeo@web160802.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20120612133311.58af9d8f@natsu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: A couple tests have been uploaded to http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1206152- STEA-VMTESTS05. Note for the nodatacow, the subvolume did have a snapshot, since the point was for VM's that could be snapshoted (either through virsh or btrfs). Thus the first write to a block was cow, but subsequent ones where not. FY, the tests are not very thorough yet