From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Elsayed Subject: Re: RBD layering design draft Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 02:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4FDB9FBB.9000807@inktank.com> <4FDF620E.7030704@inktank.com> <4FDFB4A4.1080107@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53706 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760801Ab2FVCCv (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:02:51 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShtCy-0003XH-0Y for ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 04:02:48 +0200 Received: from 66-87-112-231.pools.spcsdns.net ([66.87.112.231]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 04:02:48 +0200 Received: from eternaleye by 66-87-112-231.pools.spcsdns.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 04:02:48 +0200 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Dan Mick inktank.com> writes: > > On 06/18/2012 11:01 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Josh Durgin wrote: > >>>> $ rbd copyup pool2/child1 > "disown" and "adopt"? :) (actually I started as a joke, but really I > kinda like that; fits with the parent-child name) The issue I see with that is that the argument refers to the child rather than the parent, so it doesn't match. I personally like 'unshare' since it'll also work in the dedup case, but if we stick with the parent/child terminology 'emancipate' might work (although it lacks a good reverse).