From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>) id 1Td17L-0001Gc-LT
	for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:01:07 +0100
Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de
	(ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24])
	by mail.cvg.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAQFjETH001973
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:45:15 +0100
Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim
	4.76) (envelope-from <ensc@sigma-chemnitz.de>) id 1Td0ry-0004cY-KD
	for bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:45:14 +0100
From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
To: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:45:14 +0100
Message-ID: <ly624ss705.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1
X-Spam-Score: -5.6
X-Spam-Level: -----
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_NEUTRAL,DSPAM_INNOCENT
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73
Subject: Broken SRC_URI handling
X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitbake-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/bitbake-devel>,
	<mailto:bitbake-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitbake-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bitbake-devel>,
	<mailto:bitbake-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:01:07 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi,

commit 07b5f84133ac79aac4e939ea5f24390ad7f940a5 introduced a regression
with

| +            if not newpath or not os.path.exists(newpath) and path.find("*") != -1:


When an SRC_URI element is not found, some directory in the search path
is copied insted.

There should be probably added some parentheses in the expression above.
At the moment, the 'A or B and C' above is interpreted as 'A or (B and
C)' due to operator precedences.


Enrico