From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D3CC7618D for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.cvg.de (smtpout.cvg.de [87.128.211.67]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.159062.1680789714600708062 for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 07:02:00 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@sigma-chemnitz.de header.s=v2022040800 header.b=Gn6rx9t9; spf=pass (domain: sigma-chemnitz.de, ip: 87.128.211.67, mailfrom: enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de) Received: from mail-mta-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (mail-mta-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.12.70]) by mail-out-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 336E1pea1319648 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:01:51 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sigma-chemnitz.de; s=v2022040800; t=1680789711; bh=Zpi6yp8jYvFz9TyAps2dqUDLtZlt20L0ZFsSntxYrgo=; l=489; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Gn6rx9t9s4vhgOpuOT/iLYiHuKfyDm2iY/UTPshEtpCEbirT4MbrTT9VCbAaUKfS+ vfETitA2CzeZhijsuYkWlF2OoI3CQQlbMGJKcBaiIjoaCFLNhg39ShOVw6/fH2javR usYInIRBj3jcufHrpWG1/5qsXfHrNMVhwo1bmNI088VZDpDNXoB5xJHu+gpx3bYDtk znn6SgnB41DUOnS/YeaLg/xZFi6j0CPIHpQ+jY9LIDevjEKBQN3ghHBdu77MF8Xo7e 5YXQSREHoepU97r3njHpJer+2DGna682Zhu/zVKPH6MVFgSX/+eUIKRzKnNyp22emF JsPTnr3dbStfQ== Received: from reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (reddoxx.sigma.local [192.168.16.32]) by mail-mta-2.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTP id 336E1j4c1680478 for from enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de; Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:01:46 +0200 Received: from mail-msa-3.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de ([192.168.12.73]) by reddoxx.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with ESMTP id I1SLBHP155; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:01:45 +0200 Received: from ensc-pc.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (ensc-pc.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24]) by mail-msa-3.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 336E1jhI1384526 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Apr 2023 16:01:45 +0200 Received: from ensc by ensc-pc.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pkQBN-000Qrm-0y; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:01:45 +0200 From: Enrico Scholz To: Richard Purdie Cc: Frederic Martinsons , bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [bitbake-devel] [PATCH] fetch:crate: create versioned 'name' entries References: <20230405101609.3309660-1-enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de> <17530ADB1695B5D1.3977@lists.openembedded.org> <088f748bc07ec93c833dbdbf1a941225de62f553.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:01:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Purdie's message of "Thu, 06 Apr 2023 13:14:21 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: Enrico Scholz X-REDDOXX-Id: 642ed0c95038ce378780d23f List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Thu, 06 Apr 2023 14:02:05 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/14675 Richard Purdie writes: > Now I've been looking more closely at this, I did start to wonder if we > shouldn't just put ;sha256sum=XXX parameters onto the crate urls we > generate though? If we do that, we don't need to name them at all. yes; I think, it is a good idea for autogenerated code. But for manually written one, I somehow still prefer the dedicated SRC_URI[.sha256sum] syntax because it easier to read and fix. Enrico