From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.cvg.de ([62.153.82.30])
	by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>) id 1OPEnr-0002xo-Hv
	for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:06:44 +0200
Received: from ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de
	(ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de [192.168.3.24])
	by mail.cvg.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5HD240Y009598
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:02:05 +0200
Received: from ensc by ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de with local (Exim
	4.72) (envelope-from <ensc@sigma-chemnitz.de>)
	id 1OPEjM-0000Qc-Mk; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:02:04 +0200
From: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
References: <20100617121913.GA16207@rhein.zuhause.netz>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:02:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20100617121913.GA16207@rhein.zuhause.netz> (Henning Heinold's
	message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:19:13 +0200")
Message-ID: <lyvd9hhkxf.fsf@ensc-virt.intern.sigma-chemnitz.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 62.153.82.30
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.153.82.30
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org)
Subject: Re: Proposal to remove libattr recipe
X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions
	<openembedded-devel.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>,
	<mailto:openembedded-devel-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:06:45 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Henning Heinold <heinold@inf.fu-berlin.de> writes:

> the libattr from xfsprogs clashes with the attr recipe from udev and I
> can find any recipe which uses libattr, besides libcap2 which could
> use attr from udev too. So my proposal is to remove the libattr recipe
> and switch libcap2 to use attr from udev.

Because 'xfs' is upstream for attr + acl it would be probably better to
do the opposite thing (remove these general libraries from udev/ and
update the xfsprogs/ version).  Or, remove both versions and move the
best one into toplevel /attr + /acl.


Enrico