From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] make kthread_stop() scalable
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:44:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14pnjon4m.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070413130236.GA173@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:02:36 +0400")
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
> It's a shame kthread_stop() (may take a while!) runs with a global semaphore
> held. With this patch kthread() allocates all neccesary data (struct kthread)
> on its own stack, globals kthread_stop_xxx are deleted.
Oleg so fare you patches have been inspiring. However..
> HACKS:
>
> - re-use task_struct->set_child_tid to point to "struct kthread"
task_struct->vfork_done is a better cannidate.
> - use do_exit() directly to preserve "struct kthread" on stack
Calling do_exit directly like that is not a hack, as it appears the preferred
way to exit is to call do_exit, or complete_and_exit.
While this does improve the scalability and remove a global variable. It
also introduces a complex special case in the form of struct kthread.
It also doesn't solve the biggest problem with the current kthread interface
in that calling kthread_stop does not cause the code to break out of
interruptible sleeps.
> static int kthread(void *_create)
> {
> - struct kthread_create_info *create = _create;
> - int (*threadfn)(void *data);
> - void *data;
> - int ret = -EINTR;
> + struct kthread self = {
> + .task = current,
> + .err = -EINTR,
> + };
>
> /* Copy data: it's on kthread's stack */
> - threadfn = create->threadfn;
> - data = create->data;
> + struct kthread_create_info *create = _create;
> + int (*threadfn)(void *data) = create->threadfn;
> + void *data = create->data;
> +
> + /*
> + * This should be enough to assure that self is still on
> + * stack when we enter do_exit()
> + */
> + set_kthread(&self);
> + create->result = &self;
>
> @@ -91,7 +105,7 @@ static void create_kthread(struct kthrea
>
> /* We want our own signal handler (we take no signals by default). */
> pid = kernel_thread(kthread, create, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | SIGCHLD);
> - create->result = pid;
> + create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);
Ouch. You have a nasty race here.
If kthread runs before kernel_thread returns then setting
"create->result = ERR_PTR(pid);" could easily stomp
"create->result = &self".
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-13 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-13 13:02 [PATCH 3/3] make kthread_stop() scalable Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-13 23:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-04-14 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-14 18:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-14 18:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-14 3:13 ` [PATCH] kthread: Enhance kthread_stop to abort interruptible sleeps Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-14 3:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-14 3:17 ` [PATCH] kthread: Simplify kthread_create Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-14 3:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-14 18:35 ` [PATCH] kthread: Enhance kthread_stop to abort interruptible sleeps Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-14 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-14 19:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-24 10:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 10:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 10:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 10:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 11:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 11:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-24 15:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-24 17:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-24 20:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-24 21:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m14pnjon4m.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.