From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from deimos.frii.net (deimos.frii.com [216.17.128.2]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38466482A for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:59:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from riverrock.org (really [127.0.0.1]) by bame.riverrock.org via smail with esmtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.111) for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:57:25 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: To: Richard Hirst Cc: Matt Taggart , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, bame@www.riverrock.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: hppa64 cross compiler debs available In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Hirst of "Thu, 24 May 2001 11:38:40 BST." <20010524113840.V8736@linuxcare.com> References: <20010523231045.0DF9037CA8@carmen.fc.hp.com> <20010524113840.V8736@linuxcare.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:57:25 -0600 From: Paul Bame List-ID: > > They depend on libc 2.2.3, so if I want to use them for building > the 64 bit kernel-images for boot-floppies to use, I need 2.2.3 on my > build system. That probably means I need 2.2.3 on the root.bin. > > Should I go down that road, or are we sticking with 2.2.1 for > initial install images? I recommend sticking with 2.2.1 for the root.bin and maybe base system. The apt-get somebody uses for grabbing the xc debs could depend on 2.2.3 and as will many things before too long. -P