From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] bkl core patches for 2.6.33
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:26:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17hsx1zbw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912081211350.3089@localhost.localdomain> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Tue\, 8 Dec 2009 12\:14\:09 +0100 \(CET\)")
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
>>
>> > Linus,
>> >
>> > Please pull the latest bkl-core-for-linus git tree from:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git bkl-core-for-linus
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Was this tree in linux-next? I'm certain I would have remembered the
>> conflict in kernel/sysctl.c. Among other things in my sysctl tree
>> lock_kernel() is gone. The removal of lock_kernel() happened to fall
>> out of my other changes. I remember having a conversation with Arnd
>> Bergmann about this, and the conclusion being was that my change
>> correct and superior to this patch. So I'm surprised a sysctl change
>> made it into your tree.
>
> Sorry, that change was excluded from next and I completely forgot
> about your patches when I was preparing the pull request. Zapped the
> commit in question already.
Thanks. That is one less minor conflict to worry about.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-06 17:58 [GIT pull] bkl core patches for 2.6.33 Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-06 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-06 18:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-07 8:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-06 23:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-12-07 21:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-08 11:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-08 11:26 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17hsx1zbw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.