All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Sid Boyce <g3vbv@blueyonder.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, auxsvr@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1 and 2.6.21-rc2 kwin dies silently
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:17:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17itabbbv.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070321193420.GP752@stusta.de> (Adrian Bunk's message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:34:20 +0100")

Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:43:11PM +0000, Sid Boyce wrote:
>> Sid Boyce wrote:
>> >Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >>(cc restored.  Please always do reply-to-all)
>> >>
>> >> 
>> >>>On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:05:13 +0200 auxsvr@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>On Wednesday 28 February 2007 17:19, Sid Boyce wrote:
>> >>>   
>> >>>>openSUSE 10.3 Alpha and KDE-3.5.6, xorg-x11-7.2. KDE is setup not to
>> >>>>require a password to unlock, but it asks for password. When the screen
>> >>>>unlocks, kwin is gone with no errors logged in /var/log/kdm or
>> >>>>/var/log/messages. No problems with 2.6.20.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Same problem on openSUSE 10.2 x86_64, KDE-3.5.5 and 2.6.21-rc2.
>> >>>>Regards
>> >>>>Sid.
>> >>>>      
>> >>>This is the linux kernel mailing list. Perhaps you should post your 
>> >>>problem to the opensuse mailing list.
>> >>>    
>> >>
>> >>2.6.20 worked.
>> >>
>> >>2.6.20-rc2 did not.
>> >>
>> >>Working theory: the kernel broke.
>> >>
>> >>Sid, the chances that anyone can work out what caused this are pretty 
>> >>low. It would be great if you could perform a git bisection search 
>> >>sometime in
>> >>the next few weeks, work out which commit caused this.
>> >>
>> >>Thanks.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  
>> >I shall go back to 2.6.20-git3 and work forward. Up to 2.6.20-git2 was OK.
>> >Regards
>> >Sid.
>> >
>> 
>> I tracked the problem down to 2.6.20-git11. Up to 2.6.20-git10 is OK, 
>> but from 2.6.20-git11 up to current 2.6.21-rc4-git2 all exhibit the problem.
>
> Thanks for this search.
>
> Looking at the changes between 2.6.20-git10 and 2.6.20-git11, the only 
> suspicious changes are the 60 sysctl patches by Eric.
>
> Eric, can you look at this issue?

git bisect between git10 (ac98695d6c1508b724f246f38ce57fb4e3cec356)
and git11 (86a71dbd3e81e8870d0f0e56b87875f57e58222b) is likely the most
productive thing that can be done right now.  

I can't think of anything in my sysctl patches that would kill an
application.  My sysctl work is right on the border with user space
so it is a good candidate but at the same time there should have
been no user visible changes.  There were a few places where
I removed sys_sysctl support (but not /proc/sys support) but I don't
think any of those were on x86, and they were is such a messed up
state I don't think anyone could have reasonably used them anyway.

So I think either we poke blindly making random guess by hand or
we let git-bisect do it.

Sid do you think you can figure out git-bisect?
git-bisect start
git-bisect bad 86a71dbd3e81e8870d0f0e56b87875f57e58222b
git-bisect good ac98695d6c1508b724f246f38ce57fb4e3cec356

It should narrow the problem down to a single commit in 6-8 tries
after which point we should have enough information to start
making intelligent guesses. 

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-21 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-28 15:19 2.6.21-rc1 and 2.6.21-rc2 kwin dies silently Sid Boyce
2007-02-28 16:05 ` auxsvr
2007-03-08  5:47   ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-08  7:34     ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-21 17:43       ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-21 19:34         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-21 20:17           ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-03-22  1:32             ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-22  1:42               ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-22 10:59                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-22 19:49                   ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-26 12:02                     ` boris
2007-03-27  3:38                   ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-27 13:48                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-28  3:26                       ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-28  4:14                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-28 13:17                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-29 11:35                           ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-30 18:00                             ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-29  4:04                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-03-29 11:37                           ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-29 16:16                             ` Sid Boyce
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-28 16:24 Sid Boyce
     [not found] <45E5DE32.2070902@argo.co.il>
2007-03-01 13:52 ` Sid Boyce
2007-03-01 15:11   ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-02  4:22     ` Sid Boyce
     [not found] <45E939E1.8050501@argo.co.il>
2007-03-03 20:30 ` Sid Boyce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m17itabbbv.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=auxsvr@gmail.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=g3vbv@blueyonder.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.