From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] sysctl: Separate the binary sysctl logic into it's own file. Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:33:31 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1257468114-6823-1-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <200911061004.01007.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:57241 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754508AbZKFLdd (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 06:33:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200911061004.01007.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (Christian Borntraeger's message of "Fri\, 6 Nov 2009 10\:04\:00 +0100") Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christian Borntraeger writes: > Am Freitag 06 November 2009 01:41:44 schrieb Eric W. Biederman: >> From: Eric W. Biederman >> >> In preparation for more invasive cleanups separate the core >> binary sysctl logic into it's own file. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman > > Hmm, with your patches on Linus git I get the following on s390: > > kernel/sysctl_binary.c: In function 'SYSC_sysctl': > kernel/sysctl_binary.c:126: error: implicit declaration of function > 'lock_kernel' > kernel/sysctl_binary.c:129: error: implicit declaration of function > 'unlock_kernel' Bah. A missing smp_lock.h. Thanks. Eric