From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
hadi@cyberus.ca, tcw@tempest.prismnet.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
Date: 11 Sep 2002 09:06:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1d6rko9ab.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477096648.1031728254@[10.10.2.3]>
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> writes:
> >> > Ie. the headers that don't need to go across the bus are the critical
> >> > resource saved by TSO.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure that's entirely true in this case - the Netfinity
> >> 8500R is slightly unusual in that it has 3 or 4 PCI buses, and
> >> there's 4 - 8 gigabit ethernet cards in this beast spread around
> >> different buses (Troy - are we still just using 4? ... and what's
> >> the raw bandwidth of data we're pushing? ... it's not huge).
> >>
> >> I think we're CPU limited (there's no idle time on this machine),
> >> which is odd for an 8 CPU 900MHz P3 Xeon,
> >
> > Quite possibly. The P3 has roughly an 800MB/s FSB bandwidth, that must
> > be used for both I/O and memory accesses. So just driving a gige card at
> > wire speed takes a considerable portion of the cpus capacity.
> >
> > On analyzing this kind of thing I usually find it quite helpful to
> > compute what the hardware can theoretically to get a feel where the
> > bottlenecks should be.
>
> We can push about 420MB/s of IO out of this thing (out of that
> theoretical 800Mb/s).
Sounds about average for a P3. I have pushed the full 800MiB/s out of
a P3 processor to memory but it was a very optimized loop. Is
that 420MB/sec of IO on this test?
> Specweb is only pushing about 120MB/s of
> total data through it, so it's not bus limited in this case.
Note quite. But you suck at least 240MB/s of your memory bandwidth with
DMA from disk, and then DMA to the nic. Unless there is a highly
cached component. So I doubt you can effectively use more than 1 gige
card, maybe 2. And you have 8?
> Of course, I should have given you that data to start with,
> but ... ;-)
>
> PS. This thing actually has 3 system buses, 1 for each of the two
> sets of 4 CPUs, and 1 for all the PCI buses, and the three buses
> are joined by an interconnect in the middle. But all the IO goes
> through 1 of those buses, so for the purposes of this discussion,
> it makes no difference whatsoever ;-)
Wow the hardware designers really believed in over-subscription.
If the busses are just running 64bit/33Mhz you are oversubscribed.
And at 64bit/66Mhz the pci busses can easily swamp the system
533*4 ~= 2128MB/s.
What kind of memory bandwidth does the system have, and on which
bus are the memory controllers? I'm just curious
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-11 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-05 18:30 Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 Troy Wilson
2002-09-05 20:59 ` jamal
2002-09-05 22:11 ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-05 22:39 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-05 23:01 ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-05 22:48 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 1:47 ` jamal
2002-09-06 3:38 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 3:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 4:20 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 4:17 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-07 0:05 ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-06 3:56 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 3:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 6:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 6:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 7:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-06 7:22 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 9:54 ` jamal
2002-09-06 14:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 15:38 ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 16:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 16:21 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 15:29 ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 16:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 17:36 ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 18:26 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-06 18:31 ` John Levon
2002-09-06 18:33 ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-06 18:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 18:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:19 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 19:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 19:26 ` Andi Kleen
2002-09-06 19:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 17:26 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 17:37 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:19 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 18:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 18:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 18:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:05 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 19:01 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 20:29 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-06 18:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 18:57 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 18:58 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:52 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 19:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 20:03 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-09-06 23:48 ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-11 9:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-11 14:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-11 15:06 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2002-09-11 15:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-11 15:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-11 15:27 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-12 7:28 ` Todd Underwood
2002-09-12 12:30 ` jamal
2002-09-12 13:57 ` Todd Underwood
2002-09-12 14:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-12 14:41 ` todd-lkml
2002-09-12 23:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-13 21:59 ` todd-lkml
2002-09-13 22:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-15 20:16 ` jamal
2002-09-16 4:23 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 14:16 ` todd-lkml
2002-09-16 19:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 21:32 ` todd-lkml
2002-09-16 21:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 22:53 ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-16 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 23:03 ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-16 23:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-16 23:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-16 23:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-16 23:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-17 0:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-17 10:31 ` jamal
2002-09-13 22:12 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-12 17:18 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-06 23:56 ` Troy Wilson
2002-09-06 23:52 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-07 0:18 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2002-09-07 0:27 ` Troy Wilson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-05 20:47 Feldman, Scott
2002-09-06 11:44 Robert Olsson
2002-09-06 14:37 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-06 15:38 ` Robert Olsson
2002-09-06 18:35 Manfred Spraul
2002-09-06 18:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-06 19:40 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-06 19:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-10 12:02 ` Robert Olsson
2002-09-10 16:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-09-11 7:46 ` Robert Olsson
2002-09-10 14:59 Mala Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1d6rko9ab.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tcw@tempest.prismnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.