From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Tom Vier <tmv5@home.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium
Date: 08 Dec 2001 18:33:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1d71pw51p.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73n10v6spi.fsf@amdsim2.suse.de> <20011207.124202.48805183.davem@redhat.com> <3C112DE4.60206@antefacto.com> <20011207.130316.39156883.davem@redhat.com> <20011208201907.A937@zero>
In-Reply-To: <20011208201907.A937@zero>
Tom Vier <tmv5@home.com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 01:03:16PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > They do it also for putc() if you haven't defined the appropriate
> > defines.
>
> what exactly is the difference between putc() and fputc()? the man page is
> very vague.
fputc is a function putc is a macro because the overhead of a function call
in writing a character has always been a problem...
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-09 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <p73r8q86lpn.fsf@amdsim2.suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112070710120.747-100000@mikeg.weiden.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <9upmqm$7p4$1@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-12-07 13:54 ` horrible disk thorughput on itanium Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 14:20 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 16:14 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-07 17:18 ` Robert Love
2001-12-07 17:40 ` Richard Gooch
2001-12-07 17:48 ` Robert Love
2001-12-07 17:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2001-12-07 18:14 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 18:35 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 21:22 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 21:37 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 22:26 ` Michael Poole
2001-12-07 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-12-07 18:41 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 18:33 ` Padraig Brady
2001-12-07 20:44 ` Greg Hennessy
2001-12-07 21:37 ` Marco Colombo
2001-12-07 20:42 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <3C112DE4.60206@antefacto.com>
[not found] ` <20011207.130316.39156883.davem@redhat.com>
2001-12-09 1:19 ` [OT] fputc vs putc " Tom Vier
2001-12-09 1:33 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2001-12-09 9:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2001-12-09 19:14 ` Tom Vier
2001-12-09 22:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1d71pw51p.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tmv5@home.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.