From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Handle gso packets in dev_forward_skb Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 12:36:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1300743744.2837.7.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20110327.180922.59673799.davem@davemloft.net> <1301340048.2506.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, greearb@candelatech.com, arnd@arndb.de, kaber@trash.net, Daniel Lezcano To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:38067 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752566Ab1C1Tgf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:36:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1301340048.2506.13.camel@edumazet-laptop> (Eric Dumazet's message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:20:48 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Dumazet writes: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2011 =C3=A0 18:09 -0700, David Miller a =C3=A9cri= t : >> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) >> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:00:56 -0700 >>=20 >> > Eric Dumazet writes: >> >=20 >> >> Hmm, did you follow http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/86815/ >> >> discussion ? >> >=20 >> > No. It seems I missed it, but I do have the same problem, and >> > essentially the same fix.=20 >>=20 >> Can someone work on getting this straightened out and resubmit the >> final patch so I can apply something? >>=20 > > Apparently Daniel is busy. > > I guess we can use Eric B. patch, then ? That sounds good to me. After reviewing the other thread to the best of my knowledge there are no issues with the patch I submitted. At worst I am 4 bytes extra permissive about the mtu because of the way that path handles vlan headers and that isn't something my patch changed. Eric