From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Batched netns improvements.
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:23:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fx7smbt2.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259845591.3766.30.camel@bigi> (jamal's message of "Thu\, 03 Dec 2009 08\:06\:31 -0500")
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 04:27 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> This series of patches takes my simple 4k network namespace exit test
>> from about 44s to 1.6s, with a minuscule increase in code side.
>
> Nice.
> I will test these as soon as they make it into net-next (just easier
> for me given the setup).
> I should confirm that:
> The previous patches which are already in net-next from yesterday do
> improve performance to under 1 minute. Can we call that a several-factor
> improvement?;->
>
> Are you planning to give some tender loving to the virtual devices
> as well (gre etc) or is that taken care of now you have a pernet batch
> exit op?
The tunnel devices gre, ipip, sit, ip6_tunnel, and the ethernet
bridging still need some tlc to give them rtnl_link_ops, and in
particular dellink operations so the deletions can be done in one big
batch.
The batch operations are mostly a generalization of a bunch of what
was already there.
I keep planning on doing something else and then I wind up working on
this.
Mostly what I have done turned out to be some very low hanging fruit,
and some general cleanups.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-03 12:27 [PATCH 0/7] Batched netns improvements Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] net: Add support for batching network namespace cleanups Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] net: Move network device exit batching Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] net: Allow xfrm_user_net_exit to batch efficiently Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] netns: Add an explicit rcu_barrier to unregister_pernet_{device|subsys} Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] net: Allow fib_rule_unregister to batch Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] net: Use rcu lookups in inet_twsk_purge Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] net: Batch inet_twsk_purge Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 13:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-12-03 13:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 20:24 ` David Miller
2009-12-03 20:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 13:06 ` [PATCH 0/7] Batched netns improvements jamal
2009-12-03 13:23 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-12-03 20:24 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1fx7smbt2.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.