All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jarod Wilson <jwilson@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec()
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:33:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1hbcous3o.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110201071933.GA21239@cr0.nay.redhat.com> ("Américo Wang"'s message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:19:50 +0800")

Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> writes:

> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:59:39PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>
>>Anyway, if an image is loaded and we have setup to capture dump also
>>why do we need to save kmsg with the help of an helper. I am assuming
>>this is more of a debugging aid if we have no other way to capture the
>>kernel log buffer. So if somebody has setup kdump to capture the
>>vmcore, why to call another handler which tries to save part of the
>>vmcore (kmsg) separately.
>>
>
> Well, kmsg dumper is not only for panic/oops, it can also save kernel
> messages when the system is reboot/halt.
>
> Yeah, it is true that vmcore contains log_buf, but I think the users
> of ramoops/mtdoops are mainly those who don't have kdump configured
> in their kernels, they are cheaper than kdump, but less powerful

The issue is the inane call inside crash_kexec.

It requires both a kexec kernel to be loaded and it requires you to be
crashing.  Given that when I audited the kmsg_dump handlers they really
weren't safe in a crash dump scenario we should just remove it.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-01  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-31 22:59 Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec() Vivek Goyal
2011-02-01  7:19 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-01  7:33   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2011-02-01  7:38     ` Américo Wang
2011-02-01  8:13       ` [Patch] kexec: remove KMSG_DUMP_KEXEC (was Re: Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec()) Américo Wang
2011-02-01 15:28         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-01 16:06           ` Jarod Wilson
2011-02-03  0:59         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03  2:07           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03  4:53             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-26 20:10               ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-28  1:43                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-05-30  7:30                   ` Américo Wang
2011-05-30  5:13                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-31 21:51                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 11:00                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-14 22:13                       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 20:58                 ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-05-31 21:37                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-31 22:24                     ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-06-02  3:26                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-06-08  0:00                         ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-09 11:15                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03  0:55 ` Query about kdump_msg hook into crash_kexec() KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03  2:05   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03  4:52     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-03  5:20       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-04 15:00         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-08  1:31           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-04 14:58       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03 18:38     ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-02-03 21:13       ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-03 22:08         ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-02-04  2:24           ` Américo Wang
2011-02-04  2:50             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04  3:28               ` Américo Wang
2011-02-04  6:40                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-02-08 16:46           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-08 17:35             ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-08 19:27               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-08 19:58                 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1hbcous3o.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jwilson@redhat.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.