From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: landley@webofficenow.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Microsoft and Xenix.
Date: 24 Jun 2001 21:17:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ithlb646.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E15DZbq-0008D8-00@roo.home> <01062310075401.00696@localhost.localdomain> <m1ofrebnkx.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain>
Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com> writes:
> On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com> writes:
> > > Ummm... GEM was the Geos stuff? (Yeah I remember it, I haven't
> > > researched it yet though...)
> >
> > GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe.
> > Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity.
>
> Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt never
> tried its gui.)
Actually I believe GEM predates DR-DOS, and except for being
made by the same company I don't think they were ever related.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-25 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-22 22:41 Microsoft and Xenix Alan Chandler
2001-06-23 14:07 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 0:13 ` Michael Alan Dorman
2001-06-24 14:18 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 1:45 ` Jeff Dike
2001-06-24 20:51 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 0:49 ` John Adams
2001-06-24 14:25 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 2:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-06-24 10:36 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 22:20 ` [OT] " Daniel Phillips
2001-06-25 3:38 ` Michal Jaegermann
2001-06-24 22:41 ` Chris Meadors
2001-06-24 21:13 ` Microsoft and Xenix - Now there's a mailing list for this discussion Rob Landley
2001-06-25 0:55 ` Microsoft and Xenix William T Wilson
2001-06-25 17:11 ` asmith
2001-06-25 18:18 ` Robert J.Dunlop
2001-06-25 3:17 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2001-07-02 10:04 ` Juan Quintela
2001-06-25 19:23 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-26 15:16 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-26 21:26 ` Michael Meissner
2001-06-27 8:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-06-27 18:07 ` Peter De Schrijver
2001-06-27 13:43 ` Peter Bergner
2001-06-28 21:11 ` Thomas Dodd
2001-06-23 17:57 ` Mike Jagdis
2001-06-23 17:11 ` Rob Landley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-24 2:41 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24 3:07 ` Mike Castle
2001-06-24 14:44 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 15:13 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-25 14:17 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 19:57 ` Erik Mouw
2001-06-27 2:10 ` Steve Underwood
2001-06-25 19:30 ` Kai Henningsen
2001-06-25 20:19 ` asmith
2001-06-24 14:32 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-24 2:59 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-25 2:51 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-24 23:21 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 17:14 ` asmith
2001-06-25 14:54 ` Rob Landley
2001-06-25 17:29 Wayne.Brown
2001-06-26 3:21 Jocelyn Mayer
2001-06-26 15:15 ` Joel Jaeggli
2001-06-26 16:15 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-26 16:42 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1ithlb646.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.