Re: Flooded by do_IRQ: 0.91 No irq handler for vector

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <lfpg.dev@gmail.com> writes:

> I have changed my distro to sidux, so it won't be an easy task to
> return to 2.6.24....
> Anyway, I do use the 64bit kernel.

> But I've downloaded the 32 bit version (sidux 2009.02 with the
> 2.6.30.1 kernel), and the very same error occurs. I've just used the
> live cd, and it does happen.

Sure.  I inferred this by how early this message starting showing
up.   This code did not get added into the 32bit kernels until
recently.

> Something that changed from 2.6.28 to 2.6.30 is that it no longer
> happens the 0.99 message. All complaints are about 0.91...

Interesting.

> One more thing: Deleting /usr/sbin/irqbalance changed nothing, which
> is no surprise, as I had already tested the noirqbalance kernel
> option....

Even after a reboot?

Are you running any kind of vitalization on your box?

> I'm pasting here something I had previously replied personally to
> Robert Hancock, and may be useful:
>
> Well, as I've installed sidux, it has upgraded the kernel to 2.6.30.5,
> but the error is the same.
> I've also tried:
> * noapic: the message changes to do_IRQ: 0.55 No irq handler for
> vector (irq -1), but then the X server fails to start

Interesting... 

> * noacpi: have no effect on the error message.

There is something very strange about your box.  Possibly it is
just VIA interrupt controller madness.  VIA has been known
to interrupt interrupt related fields in creative ways, and
we may be on the edge of another of these.

I expect it is going to come down to writing a patch to dump out
all of the interrupt routing state on the system and to see what
is generating the totally unexpected interrupt and then to work our
way backwards from there.

The fact that the vector number is changing indicates that it is
a programmable something that is causing the problem.

I'm drawing a blank on which patch to write up.

Eric