All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] user namespaces: require cap_set{ug}id for CLONE_NEWUSER
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:17:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k5aepmne.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081205164552.GA16788@us.ibm.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:45:52 -0600")

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:

>> Personally the user namespace only becomes interesting when we
>> start to be able to move in the other direction and remove the
>> set of capabilities requires to create it.
>> 
>> Eric
>
> Agreed.  Now the thing is I don't think we need full userns
> support to get there.  We just need the targeted capabilities
> and the basic dummy fs support - that is, init_user_ns owns
> all vfsmounts, and anyone not in init_user_ns only gets
> user other access to files under those mounts.

Right.

> Of course complete support for targeted caps will in itself
> be a huge effort :)
>
> So my roadmap is: next address the per-user keyring, then
> the targeted caps.

Sounds good.

I expect this means we will pass through a period where the user
namespace is less useful than it is today.  But as it will be on
a much firmer foundation that is fine.

Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-05 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-03 19:17 [PATCH 1/2] user namespaces: let user_ns be cloned with fairsched Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-03 19:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] user namespaces: require cap_set{ug}id for CLONE_NEWUSER Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-05 16:24   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-12-05 16:45     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-05 17:17       ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-12-05 17:14   ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-12-07 22:47     ` James Morris
2008-12-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] user namespaces: let user_ns be cloned with fairsched James Morris
2008-12-05 14:44   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-07 22:46 ` James Morris
2008-12-08 16:04   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-08 21:15     ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1k5aepmne.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.