From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix?
Date: 15 Feb 2001 09:00:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k86s6imn.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A899FEB.D54ABBC7@sympatico.ca> <m1lmr98c5t.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> <3A8ADA30.2936D3B1@sympatico.ca> <m1hf1w8qea.fsf@frodo.biederman.org> <3A8BF5ED.1C12435A@colorfullife.com>
In-Reply-To: Manfred Spraul's message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:29:49 +0100"
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes:
> "Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
> >
> > But the gcc bounds checking work is the ultimate buffer overflow fix.
> > You can recompile all of your trusted applications, and libraries with
> > it and be safe from one source of bugs.
> >
>
> void main(int argc, char **argv[])
> {
> char local[128];
> if(argc > 2)
> strcpy(local,argv[1]);
> }
>
> Unless you modify the ABI and pass the array bounds around you won't
> catch such problems,
Of course. But this is linux and you have the source. And I did mention
you needed to recompile the libraries your trusted applications depended on.
> and I won't even mention unions and
>
> struct dyn_data {
> int len;
> char data[];
> }
Yep bounds checking is not an easy fix. But it is a good fix.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-15 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-13 20:58 Is this the ultimate stack-smash fix? Jeremy Jackson
2001-02-13 21:06 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-13 21:22 ` James Sutherland
2001-02-13 23:04 ` Bruce Harada
2001-02-13 23:14 ` William T Wilson
2001-02-14 16:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-02-14 19:19 ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-02-14 20:43 ` Gerhard Mack
2001-02-15 5:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-02-15 15:29 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-15 16:00 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2001-02-17 14:43 ` Peter Samuelson
2001-02-18 4:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-02-20 1:10 ` Andreas Bombe
2001-02-20 9:09 ` Xavier Bestel
2001-02-20 16:40 ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-02-20 17:04 ` Xavier Bestel
2001-02-21 0:13 ` Andreas Bombe
2001-02-21 9:30 ` Xavier Bestel
2001-02-15 15:32 ` Jeremy Jackson
2001-02-17 10:47 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-17 20:32 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1k86s6imn.fsf@frodo.biederman.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.