From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932912Ab0CaSJ5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:09:57 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:35526 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757910Ab0CaSJz (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:09:55 -0400 To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kay Sievers , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Cornelia Huck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Benjamin LaHaise , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] tagged sysfs support References: <20100331172110.GA18838@us.ibm.com> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:09:46 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20100331172110.GA18838@us.ibm.com> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Wed\, 31 Mar 2010 12\:21\:10 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: serue@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcrl@lhnet.ca, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, gregkh@suse.de X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on in01.mta.xmission.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Serge E. Hallyn" writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xmission.com): >> >> The main short coming of using multiple network namespaces today >> is that only network devices for the primary network namespaces >> can be put in the kobject layer and sysfs. >> >> This is essentially the earlier version of this patchset that was >> reviewed before, just now on top of a version of sysfs that doesn't >> need cleanup patches to support it. >> >> I have been running these patches in some form for well over a >> year so the basics should at least be solid. >> >> This patchset is currently against 2.6.34-rc1. >> >> This patchset is just the basic infrastructure a couple of more pretty >> trivial patches are needed to actually enable network namespaces to use this. >> My current plan is to send those after these patches have made it through >> review. > > Thanks very much for keeping this going, Eric! I'm going to keep > looking through the code some more, but so far I see no problems. > > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn > > to the full patchset. I'm really hoping you'll also include the > patch to implement the netns support (i.e. basically commit > fdc0adeaa8bfab9a179e1eb349cab400ddb70403 that you sent inline this > morning to Tejun). One step at a time. My goal is to have it all send out and reviewed in time for 2.6.35. Eric