From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [Bug #15319] [BUG]: Possibe recursive locking detected in sysfs Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:59:30 -0700 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Sun\, 21 Mar 2010 21\:30\:49 +0100 \(CET\)") Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , John Kacur "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15319 > Subject : [BUG]: Possibe recursive locking detected in sysfs > Submitter : John Kacur > Date : 2010-02-11 17:11 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <520f0cf11002110911t3f125649v73062e9851e2cfb3-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126590832432598&w=2 > Handled-By : Eric Biederman The false positives I introduced should be fixed as of 2.6.34-rc2. If this bug still shows up in 2.6.34-rcX it indicates a real bug. Eric From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754499Ab0CZD7i (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:59:38 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:32937 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754202Ab0CZD7g (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:59:36 -0400 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , "John Kacur" Subject: Re: [Bug #15319] [BUG]: Possibe recursive locking detected in sysfs References: From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:59:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Sun\, 21 Mar 2010 21\:30\:49 +0100 \(CET\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rjw@sisk.pl, jkacur@redhat.com, maciej.rutecki@gmail.com, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on in02.mta.xmission.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15319 > Subject : [BUG]: Possibe recursive locking detected in sysfs > Submitter : John Kacur > Date : 2010-02-11 17:11 (39 days old) > Message-ID : <520f0cf11002110911t3f125649v73062e9851e2cfb3@mail.gmail.com> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126590832432598&w=2 > Handled-By : Eric Biederman The false positives I introduced should be fixed as of 2.6.34-rc2. If this bug still shows up in 2.6.34-rcX it indicates a real bug. Eric