From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:19:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m21rcdej7b.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210317180013.235231-6-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Wednesday, 2021-03-17 at 19:00:12 +01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Test that rwlock upgrade is fair, and readers go back to sleep if a writer
> is in line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> ---
> tests/unit/test-coroutine.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c b/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c
> index e946d93a65..6e6f51d480 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-coroutine.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,67 @@ static void test_co_mutex_lockable(void)
> g_assert(QEMU_MAKE_LOCKABLE(null_pointer) == NULL);
> }
>
> +static CoRwlock rwlock;
> +
> +/* Test that readers are properly sent back to the queue when upgrading,
> + * even if they are the sole readers. The test scenario is as follows:
> + *
> + *
> + * | c1 | c2 |
> + * |--------------+------------+
> + * | rdlock | |
> + * | yield | |
> + * | | wrlock |
> + * | | <queued> |
> + * | upgrade | |
> + * | <queued> | <dequeued> |
> + * | | unlock |
> + * | <dequeued> | |
> + * | unlock | |
> + */
> +
> +static void coroutine_fn rwlock_yield_upgrade(void *opaque)
> +{
> + qemu_co_rwlock_rdlock(&rwlock);
> + qemu_coroutine_yield();
> +
> + qemu_co_rwlock_upgrade(&rwlock);
> + qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&rwlock);
> +
> + *(bool *)opaque = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void coroutine_fn rwlock_wrlock_yield(void *opaque)
> +{
> + qemu_co_rwlock_wrlock(&rwlock);
> + qemu_coroutine_yield();
> +
> + qemu_co_rwlock_unlock(&rwlock);
> + *(bool *)opaque = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_co_rwlock_upgrade(void)
> +{
> + bool c1_done = false;
> + bool c2_done = false;
> + Coroutine *c1, *c2;
> +
> + qemu_co_rwlock_init(&rwlock);
> + c1 = qemu_coroutine_create(rwlock_yield_upgrade, &c1_done);
> + c2 = qemu_coroutine_create(rwlock_wrlock_yield, &c2_done);
> +
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c1);
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c2);
> +
> + /* c1 now should go to sleep. */
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c1);
> + g_assert(!c1_done);
> +
> + qemu_coroutine_enter(c2);
> + g_assert(c1_done);
> + g_assert(c2_done);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Check that creation, enter, and return work
> */
> @@ -501,6 +562,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> g_test_add_func("/basic/order", test_order);
> g_test_add_func("/locking/co-mutex", test_co_mutex);
> g_test_add_func("/locking/co-mutex/lockable", test_co_mutex_lockable);
> + g_test_add_func("/locking/co-rwlock/upgrade", test_co_rwlock_upgrade);
> if (g_test_perf()) {
> g_test_add_func("/perf/lifecycle", perf_lifecycle);
> g_test_add_func("/perf/nesting", perf_nesting);
> --
> 2.29.2
dme.
--
Don't you know you're never going to get to France.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-17 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-17 18:00 [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] block/vdi: When writing new bmap entry fails, don't leak the buffer Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] block/vdi: Don't assume that blocks are larger than VdiHeader Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:25 ` Max Reitz
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] coroutine/mutex: Store the coroutine in the CoWaitRecord only once Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] coroutine-lock: reimplement CoRwlock to fix downgrade bug Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 16:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 18:19 ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-03-17 18:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] test-coroutine: Add rwlock downgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-24 14:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] coroutine rwlock downgrade fix, minor VDI changes Max Reitz
2021-03-24 16:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-03-24 16:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-17 12:16 [PATCH v4 " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] test-coroutine: add rwlock upgrade test Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-17 15:19 ` David Edmondson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m21rcdej7b.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.