From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [patchv3 2/4] MMC: SDHCI R1B command handling + MMC_CAP_ERASE. Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:30:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1302556424-21951-2-git-send-email-andreiw@motorola.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:43572 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750963Ab1HJNa1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:30:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1302556424-21951-2-git-send-email-andreiw@motorola.com> (Andrei Warkentin's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:13:42 -0500") Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Andrei Warkentin Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, Chuanxiao Dong Hi Andrei, On Mon, Apr 11 2011, Andrei Warkentin wrote: > ERASE command needs R1B response, so fix R1B-type command > handling for SDHCI controller. For non-DAT commands using a busy > reponse, the cmd->cmd_timeout_ms (in ms) field is used for timeout > calculations. > > Based on patch by Chuanxiao Dong > Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin Looks like this patch has been implicated in causing IO errors on ThinkPads with a Ricoh device -- please could you take a look at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38922 ? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child