From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 555EDE0090C; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:39:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (auslands-kv[at]gmx.de) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD50E007C1 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XgbXC-0000D0-Rw for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:39:42 +0200 Received: from 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.32.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:39:42 +0200 Received: from auslands-kv by 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:39:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: Neuer User Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 17:39:28 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80-218-32-173.dclient.hispeed.ch User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 Subject: [meta-qt5] How to bisect problem? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 15:39:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi I was using qt5 5.3.0-beta1 for a long time. Now I upgraded to 5.3.2, which is the current master. Now I am experiencing some video problems. I reverted back to my old 5.3.0-beta 1 and the problems are gone. So, it seems one (or more) commits between 5.3.0-beta1 and 5.3.2 are the cause of the faulty video. How can I bisect this best to find the culprit? It doesn't seem to make sense to just use git-bisect as not all versions will compile fine. Are there specific points, such as 5.3.0, 5.3.1 that I should test? Or does it make more sense to use some 5.4.0 beta version? Thanks Michael