From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] avr32: Use uncached() macro to get an address for SDRAM init
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:01:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m262zewzcq.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100813105606.2e8e656d@hskinnemoen-d830> (Haavard Skinnemoen's message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:56:06 +0700")
Hi Haavard,
> Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de> wrote:
>> So this patch replaces a construct which seems to be valid over all
>> architectures by a construct which is only used in avr32, right? It
>> also deletes the explicit statement that such a mapping is not needed
>> any further.
>
> Problem is that in order to make the CFI driver work on avr32, we need
> to change the map_physmem() macro to return the physical address
> unchanged.
I see. And I presume you cannot tell the situation apart inside
map_physmem?
>> Isn't this a step backward? Can't you put the functionality inside the
>> map function and leave the unmap a noop?
>
> I agree it's a step backward, but since the previous flamewar didn't
> get us anywhere, I decided to go for a compromise this time. At least
> this small architecture-specific kludge is localized to
> architecture-specific code.
>
> The map_physmem() macro currently does exactly the same thing as the
> uncached() macro, and the unmap is a noop, but the next patch changes
> it in order to fix the CFI driver. If the next patch is applied without
> this patch being applied first, the SDRAM driver will do cached
> accesses during initialization, and that may cause the initialization
> to fail.
Why not include a note to this extent into the git commit message? This
would be a great help for other people to later understand why this
change has been done the "backward way" that it was.
Cheers
Detlev
--
vi vi vi - the roman numeral of the beast.
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-13 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-12 6:52 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] avr32: simple paging support Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-12 6:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] avr32: Print unrelocated PC on exception Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-09-03 11:51 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-09-03 13:19 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-09-03 14:37 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-12 6:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] avr32: Use uncached() macro to get an address for SDRAM init Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-12 15:04 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-08-13 3:56 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-13 11:01 ` Detlev Zundel [this message]
2010-08-13 12:12 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-08-13 13:01 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-09-03 11:16 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-09-03 14:37 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-08-12 6:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/3] avr32: Add simple paging support Haavard Skinnemoen
2010-09-03 11:10 ` Andreas Bießmann
2010-09-03 14:38 ` Reinhard Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m262zewzcq.fsf@ohwell.denx.de \
--to=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.