From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: SDHCI regression since 2.6.39
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:49:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2aaa89t1m.fsf@bob.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E6FA44F.1050705@goop.org> (Jeremy Fitzhardinge's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:43:27 -0700")
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> If it is running, and not helping, can I persuade you to try a full
>> bisection?
>
> OK, will do.
Thank you!
>> I don't think we have other reports of this bug, and the
>> only other person who has reported something like it wasn't a kernel
>> hacker.
>
> That's interesting; the X220 is a pretty common machine these days, I
> think. I wonder if there's variations in the SD controller or something?
I just asked Matthew Garrett to check his X220, and his has the same e823
controller as you, is running a 3.1-rc kernel, and everything's working.
So it's not even variation in the controller model, it's something even
more subtle. Perhaps try some different cards? What capacity/speed is
the one you're trying? If there is a per-card difference, I suppose
we'd expect it to be that slower cards work and faster cards fail
(given the nature of the patch I linked in my last mail).
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-13 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-13 0:29 SDHCI regression since 2.6.39 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 0:36 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 13:22 ` Chris Ball
2011-09-13 17:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 17:12 ` Chris Ball
2011-09-13 18:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 18:49 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2011-09-13 19:29 ` Manoj Iyer
2011-09-13 20:27 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 20:29 ` Philip Rakity
2011-09-13 20:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <D45CBF70-F0B1-453A-9E31-A621F52C21B9@marvell.com>
[not found] ` <4E6FC422.9080306@goop.org>
[not found] ` <7C3ED924-555D-4C50-9000-36077650328C@marvell.com>
[not found] ` <4E6FCE28.5040403@goop.org>
[not found] ` <F54ECF19-5E4C-40A6-8E26-99BF223F9FE2@marvell.com>
2011-09-13 22:32 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 22:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-13 22:48 ` Philip Rakity
2011-09-14 0:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-14 13:48 ` Chris Ball
2011-09-14 13:48 ` Chris Ball
2011-09-14 16:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-14 18:38 ` Chris Ball
2011-09-14 18:38 ` Chris Ball
2011-09-14 19:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-11-03 12:53 ` CaT
2011-09-13 20:20 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2012-06-28 14:35 ` Srinivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2aaa89t1m.fsf@bob.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manoj.iyer@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.