From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:38:57 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: devicetree: amlogic: Add R-Box Pro In-Reply-To: <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber=22's?= message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:38:48 +0100") References: <20170117030611.23827-2-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-2-afaerber@suse.de> <819ac0c0-92b7-bac7-dcfc-a56c34a6bf62@baylibre.com> <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> Message-ID: To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linus-amlogic.lists.infradead.org Andreas F?rber writes: > Am 18.01.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Neil Armstrong: >> On 01/17/2017 11:54 PM, Andreas F?rber wrote: >>> Cc: ada at kingnoval.com >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber >>> --- >>> Originally I thought we would group by SoC (6, 8, 8b, gxbb, gxl, gmx, etc.) >>> but this got out of order with nexbox,a95x - so inserting kingnovel between >>> amlogic and nexbox here. If that's what we want going forward, we should move >>> the old entries to make the scheme clearer. The alternative would be to >>> reorder alphabetically within each SoC group, but nexbox,a95x with two SoCs >>> makes it difficult to categorize, we could choose gxbb as the earlier one. >> >> Andreas, >> >> Feel free to provide a fixup. > > Sure, the question is which way. ;) Kevin? Carlo? I don't have a strong preference, but continuing to group by SoC makes the most sense based on what we have there now. Moving nexbox,a95x up to the first one (gxbb) is fine with me. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:38:57 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: devicetree: amlogic: Add R-Box Pro In-Reply-To: <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber=22's?= message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:38:48 +0100") References: <20170117030611.23827-2-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-2-afaerber@suse.de> <819ac0c0-92b7-bac7-dcfc-a56c34a6bf62@baylibre.com> <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Andreas F?rber writes: > Am 18.01.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Neil Armstrong: >> On 01/17/2017 11:54 PM, Andreas F?rber wrote: >>> Cc: ada at kingnoval.com >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber >>> --- >>> Originally I thought we would group by SoC (6, 8, 8b, gxbb, gxl, gmx, etc.) >>> but this got out of order with nexbox,a95x - so inserting kingnovel between >>> amlogic and nexbox here. If that's what we want going forward, we should move >>> the old entries to make the scheme clearer. The alternative would be to >>> reorder alphabetically within each SoC group, but nexbox,a95x with two SoCs >>> makes it difficult to categorize, we could choose gxbb as the earlier one. >> >> Andreas, >> >> Feel free to provide a fixup. > > Sure, the question is which way. ;) Kevin? Carlo? I don't have a strong preference, but continuing to group by SoC makes the most sense based on what we have there now. Moving nexbox,a95x up to the first one (gxbb) is fine with me. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: devicetree: amlogic: Add R-Box Pro Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:38:57 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20170117030611.23827-2-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-2-afaerber@suse.de> <819ac0c0-92b7-bac7-dcfc-a56c34a6bf62@baylibre.com> <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber=22's?= message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:38:48 +0100") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Carlo Caione , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVyIDxhZmFlcmJlckBzdXNlLmRlPiB3cml0ZXM6Cgo+IEFtIDE4LjAxLjIw MTcgdW0gMTA6MzUgc2NocmllYiBOZWlsIEFybXN0cm9uZzoKPj4gT24gMDEvMTcvMjAxNyAxMTo1 NCBQTSwgQW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVyIHdyb3RlOgo+Pj4gQ2M6IGFkYUBraW5nbm92YWwuY29tCj4+ PiBTaWduZWQtb2ZmLWJ5OiBBbmRyZWFzIEbDpHJiZXIgPGFmYWVyYmVyQHN1c2UuZGU+Cj4+PiAt LS0KPj4+ICBPcmlnaW5hbGx5IEkgdGhvdWdodCB3ZSB3b3VsZCBncm91cCBieSBTb0MgKDYsIDgs IDhiLCBneGJiLCBneGwsIGdteCwgZXRjLikKPj4+ICBidXQgdGhpcyBnb3Qgb3V0IG9mIG9yZGVy IHdpdGggbmV4Ym94LGE5NXggLSBzbyBpbnNlcnRpbmcga2luZ25vdmVsIGJldHdlZW4KPj4+ICBh bWxvZ2ljIGFuZCBuZXhib3ggaGVyZS4gSWYgdGhhdCdzIHdoYXQgd2Ugd2FudCBnb2luZyBmb3J3 YXJkLCB3ZSBzaG91bGQgbW92ZQo+Pj4gIHRoZSBvbGQgZW50cmllcyB0byBtYWtlIHRoZSBzY2hl bWUgY2xlYXJlci4gVGhlIGFsdGVybmF0aXZlIHdvdWxkIGJlIHRvCj4+PiAgcmVvcmRlciBhbHBo YWJldGljYWxseSB3aXRoaW4gZWFjaCBTb0MgZ3JvdXAsIGJ1dCBuZXhib3gsYTk1eCB3aXRoIHR3 byBTb0NzCj4+PiAgbWFrZXMgaXQgZGlmZmljdWx0IHRvIGNhdGVnb3JpemUsIHdlIGNvdWxkIGNo b29zZSBneGJiIGFzIHRoZSBlYXJsaWVyIG9uZS4KPj4gCj4+IEFuZHJlYXMsCj4+IAo+PiBGZWVs IGZyZWUgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSBhIGZpeHVwLgo+Cj4gU3VyZSwgdGhlIHF1ZXN0aW9uIGlzIHdoaWNo IHdheS4gOykgS2V2aW4/IENhcmxvPwoKSSBkb24ndCBoYXZlIGEgc3Ryb25nIHByZWZlcmVuY2Us IGJ1dCBjb250aW51aW5nIHRvIGdyb3VwIGJ5IFNvQyBtYWtlcwp0aGUgbW9zdCBzZW5zZSBiYXNl ZCBvbiB3aGF0IHdlIGhhdmUgdGhlcmUgbm93LgoKTW92aW5nIG5leGJveCxhOTV4IHVwIHRvIHRo ZSBmaXJzdCBvbmUgKGd4YmIpIGlzIGZpbmUgd2l0aCBtZS4KCktldmluCgoKCgpfX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpsaW51eC1hcm0ta2VybmVsIG1h aWxpbmcgbGlzdApsaW51eC1hcm0ta2VybmVsQGxpc3RzLmluZnJhZGVhZC5vcmcKaHR0cDovL2xp c3RzLmluZnJhZGVhZC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9saW51eC1hcm0ta2VybmVsCg== From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751430AbdARXkb (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:40:31 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:34265 "EHLO mail-pg0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbdARXk1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:40:27 -0500 From: Kevin Hilman To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= Cc: Neil Armstrong , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Carlo Caione , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: devicetree: amlogic: Add R-Box Pro Organization: BayLibre References: <20170117030611.23827-2-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-1-afaerber@suse.de> <20170117225459.4438-2-afaerber@suse.de> <819ac0c0-92b7-bac7-dcfc-a56c34a6bf62@baylibre.com> <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:38:57 -0800 In-Reply-To: <9439ba55-c56c-71bf-00a5-870e2f4dd07b@suse.de> ("Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber=22's?= message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:38:48 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id v0INf06O005679 Andreas Färber writes: > Am 18.01.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Neil Armstrong: >> On 01/17/2017 11:54 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: >>> Cc: ada@kingnoval.com >>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber >>> --- >>> Originally I thought we would group by SoC (6, 8, 8b, gxbb, gxl, gmx, etc.) >>> but this got out of order with nexbox,a95x - so inserting kingnovel between >>> amlogic and nexbox here. If that's what we want going forward, we should move >>> the old entries to make the scheme clearer. The alternative would be to >>> reorder alphabetically within each SoC group, but nexbox,a95x with two SoCs >>> makes it difficult to categorize, we could choose gxbb as the earlier one. >> >> Andreas, >> >> Feel free to provide a fixup. > > Sure, the question is which way. ;) Kevin? Carlo? I don't have a strong preference, but continuing to group by SoC makes the most sense based on what we have there now. Moving nexbox,a95x up to the first one (gxbb) is fine with me. Kevin