From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [IPv6:2001:a60:0:32:0:1:25:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0435B6FD1 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:53:32 +1000 (EST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] powerpc: fixes for instructions not using correct register naming References: <1339155365.316308.981577666228.qpush@ale> <20120608113605.91B88D43B2F__24549.446340143$1339156128$gmane$org@localhost.localdomain> <1339195362.24838.50.camel@pasglop> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:53:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1339195362.24838.50.camel@pasglop> (Benjamin Herrenschmidt's message of "Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:42:42 +1000") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Michael Neuling , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard , Olof Johannsson List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes: > The macro system we use cannot do that (it will prefix with REG_), since > both arguments are registers we must use R0 in this case. So define a ___PPC_RA0 macro that doesn't do that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."