Re: PATCH(?): linux-2.4.4-pre2: fork should run child first

[John Fremlin <chief@bandits.org>]

 "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com> writes:

[...]

> 	It turned out that the particular unix-like system on which
> these benchmarks were taken had a version of fork that did not run
> the child first.  As it was explained to me then, most of the time,
> the child process from a fork will do just a few things and then do
> an exec(), releasing its copy-on-write references to the parent's
> pages, and that is the big win of copy-on-write for fork() in practice.
> This oversight was considered a big embarassment for the operating
> system in question, so I won't name it here.
> 
> 	Guess why you're seeing this email.  That's right.  Linux-2.4.3's
> fork() does not run the child first.

Not always, if I understand correctly. Setting to always is putting
policy in kernel in a small way. If an app wants to fork and exec, it
should use *vfork* and exec, which is a performance win across many
OSs because the COW mappings don't even have to be set up, IIRC.

[...]

-- 

	http://www.penguinpowered.com/~vii