From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: use a stronger hash for tcp Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:49:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1361485132.17413.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20130221.181822.1234155083700257175.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ncardwell@google.com, ycheng@google.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:51256 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754322Ab3BUXtS (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:49:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130221.181822.1234155083700257175.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:18:22 -0500 (EST)") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller writes: > > I bet we can consolidate this slightly, to make it less > expensive yet not give up much in terms of protection. Two > jhash3word()'s is quite a lot. jhash is not really the state of the art for general hashing anymore, murmur3 or cityhash are generally considered faster/possibly better. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only