From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:03:16 -0800 Message-ID: References: <5849e989.0209c20a.75a7.6441@mx.google.com> <20161209125802.GA4229@kozik-lap> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:33443 "EHLO mail-pf0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751987AbcLIXDS (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:03:18 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f180.google.com with SMTP id d2so5313549pfd.0 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 15:03:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161209125802.GA4229@kozik-lap> (Krzysztof Kozlowski's message of "Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:58:02 +0200") Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, Kukjin Kim , Javier Martinez Canillas , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Krzysztof Kozlowski writes: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:17:27PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> + Exynos maintainers (for new regresion on exynos5250-snow) >> >> kernelci.org bot writes: >> >> > mainline boot: 179 boots: 1 failed, 168 passed with 10 offline (v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec) >> > >> > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ >> > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/mainline/kernel/v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec/ >> > >> > Tree: mainline >> > Branch: local/master >> > Git Describe: v4.9-rc8-78-g318c8932ddec >> > Git Commit: 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e >> > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git >> > Tested: 57 unique boards, 21 SoC families, 29 builds out of 207 >> > >> > Boot Regressions Detected: >> > >> > arm: >> > >> > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n: >> > exynos5250-snow: >> > lab-collabora: new failure (last pass: v4.9-rc8-51-gbc3913a5378c) >> > >> > Boot Failure Detected: >> > >> > arm: >> > >> > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n >> > exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab > > Nothing was happening recently around Exynos code (at least mach/dts). > Was the 318c8932ddec5c1c26a4af0f3c053784841c598e pointed out by bisect? The bisect[1] pointed to this, but that doesn't smell right, and I wasn't able to dig into it any further: 2513940989fa2c56d0aeb4f5792d22804d92ab4c is the first bad commit commit 2513940989fa2c56d0aeb4f5792d22804d92ab4c Author: Michael Ellerman Date: Fri Nov 25 09:45:28 2016 +1100 Full bisect log is here[1]. Kevin [1] https://ci.linaro.org/view/people/job/tbaker-boot-bisect-bot/171/console