From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267231AbUGMX3O (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:29:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267232AbUGMX3O (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:29:14 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:16363 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267231AbUGMX3M (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:29:12 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jan Rychter Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp bootsplash support Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 04:27:16 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20040708110549.GB9919@linux.nu> <20040708133934.GA10997@infradead.org> <20040708204840.GB607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20040708210403.GA18049@infradead.org> <20040708225216.GA27815@elf.ucw.cz> <20040708225501.GA20143@infradead.org> <20040709051528.GB23152@elf.ucw.cz> <20040709115531.GA28343@redhat.com> <20040710123422.GC607@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-27-68-14.san.rr.com X-Spammers-Please: blackholeme@rychter.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gUiRFsWR2IhcgrvV2bwFCK4Uo84= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Machek writes: Pavel> Hi! > But I guess swsusp is going to make this more "interesting" as > progressbar is nice to have there, and userland can not help at that > point. >> >> Personally I'd prefer the effort went into making suspend actually >> work on more machines rather than painting eyecandy for the minority >> of machines it currently works on. Pavel> Actually, it does work on most of UP/IDE machines by now. Pavel> Remaining problems tend to be unsupported drivers. I can't help Pavel> with devices I do not have, unfortunately, so there's little I Pavel> can do. [...] Just to clarify -- in one of my previous posts I said that swsusp2 works very well for me. I meant *swsusp2*, not swsusp. It is unfortunate that the two projects are so similarly named. They are very different from the user perspective. --J.