From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
patches@linaro.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 RESEND 2/2] mmc: core: Add Poweroff Notify handling eMMC 4.5
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:09:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2obxola02.fsf@bob.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316180377-30969-3-git-send-email-girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org> (Girish K. S.'s message of "Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:09:37 +0530")
Hi Girish,
On Fri, Sep 16 2011, Girish K S wrote:
> This patch adds the power off notification handling
> during suspend and system poweroff.
> For suspend mode short timeout is used, whereas for the
> normal poweroff long timeout is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/card.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 4 ++++
> 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 91a0a74..157060f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -1130,9 +1130,41 @@ static void mmc_power_up(struct mmc_host *host)
>
> static void mmc_power_off(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> + struct mmc_card *card = host->card;
> + unsigned int notify_type;
> + unsigned int timeout;
> + int err;
> +
> host->ios.clock = 0;
> host->ios.vdd = 0;
>
> + if (card != NULL && mmc_card_mmc(card) &&
> + (mmc_card_powernotify_on(card))) {
> +
> + if (host->power_notify_type == MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_SHORT) {
> + notify_type = EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_SHORT;
> + timeout = card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time;
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_short(card);
> + } else {
> + notify_type = EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_LONG;
> + timeout = card->ext_csd.power_off_longtime;
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_long(card);
> + }
> +
> + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> + EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION,
> + notify_type, timeout);
> +
> + if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Device failed to respond "
> + "within %d poweroff time."
> + "forcefully powering down"
> + "the device\n", timeout);
You don't have any space between ".f" in the message. I suggest:
pr_err("Device failed to respond within %d poweroff "
"time. Forcefully powering down the device\n",
timeout);
> +
> + /*Set the card state to no notification after the poweroff*/
A space between /* */.
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_off(card);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Reset ocr mask to be the highest possible voltage supported for
> * this mmc host. This value will be used at next power up.
> @@ -2022,6 +2054,7 @@ int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> host->rescan_disable = 1;
> + host->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_SHORT;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
>
> @@ -2044,6 +2077,7 @@ int mmc_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *notify_block,
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> host->rescan_disable = 0;
> + host->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_LONG;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> mmc_detect_change(host, 0);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> index 2f06b37..63cc77b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> @@ -715,7 +715,8 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> * If the host supports the power_off_notify capability then
> * set the notification byte in the ext_csd register of device
> */
> - if (host->caps & MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_NOTIFY) {
> + if ((host->caps & MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_NOTIFY) &&
The && is indented weirdly. Just use a space between ") &&".
> + (mmc_card_powernotify_off(card))) {
> err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> EXT_CSD_POWER_OFF_NOTIFICATION,
> EXT_CSD_POWER_ON,
> @@ -724,6 +725,8 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
> goto free_card;
> }
>
> + if (!err)
> + mmc_card_set_powernotify_on(card);
Extra newline needed here, as there was before you added these two lines.
> /*
> * Activate high speed (if supported)
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 0e02cc1..92ea734 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2566,6 +2566,16 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> if (caps[1] & SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_DRIVER_TYPE_D;
>
> + /*
> + * If Notify capability is enabled and
> + * notify type is not initialised by host, set default to
> + * long power off notify timeout value
> + */
> + if (mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_POWER_OFF_NOTIFY)
> + mmc->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_SHORT;
> + else
> + mmc->power_notify_type = MMC_HOST_PW_NOTIFY_NONE;
> +
The comment says it sets the default to long power off if power_notify_type
is unset, but the code sets power_notify_type to short power off regardless
of whether power_notify_type was set. The comment and code should agree.
> /* Initial value for re-tuning timer count */
> host->tuning_count = (caps[1] & SDHCI_RETUNING_TIMER_COUNT_MASK) >>
> SDHCI_RETUNING_TIMER_COUNT_SHIFT;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> index 2bf2843..1d6a832 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
> @@ -190,6 +190,11 @@ struct mmc_card {
> #define MMC_QUIRK_DISABLE_CD (1<<5) /* disconnect CD/DAT[3] resistor */
> #define MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38 (1<<6) /* iNAND devices have broken CMD38 */
> #define MMC_QUIRK_BLK_NO_CMD23 (1<<7) /* Avoid CMD23 for regular multiblock */
> + unsigned int poweroff_notify_state;/*eMMC4.5 notify feature */
> +#define MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION 0
> +#define MMC_POWERED_ON 1
> +#define MMC_POWEROFF_SHORT 2
> +#define MMC_POWEROFF_LONG 3
>
> unsigned int erase_size; /* erase size in sectors */
> unsigned int erase_shift; /* if erase unit is power 2 */
> @@ -325,6 +330,20 @@ static inline void __maybe_unused remove_quirk(struct mmc_card *card, int data)
> #define mmc_sd_card_set_uhs(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_STATE_ULTRAHIGHSPEED)
> #define mmc_card_set_ext_capacity(c) ((c)->state |= MMC_CARD_SDXC)
>
> +#define mmc_card_powernotify_on(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state == MMC_POWERED_ON)
> +#define mmc_card_powernotify_off(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state == MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION)
> +
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_off(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION)
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_on(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_POWERED_ON)
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_short(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_POWEROFF_SHORT)
> +#define mmc_card_set_powernotify_long(c) \
> + ((c)->poweroff_notify_state = MMC_POWEROFF_LONG)
> +
I don't think these macros need to exist. You can already do the same
thing in one line of code, and it would be clearer to be modifying/testing
poweroff_notify_state directly. The only case where it might save enough
column space to allow fitting everything on one line is for
MMC_NO_POWER_NOTIFICATION, but maybe that's just a sign that this
#define should be made shorter somehow.
Thanks! Please could you rebase against mmc-next, fix, and resend?
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-16 13:39 [PATCH V6 RESEND 0/2] Poweroff Notify eMMC 4.5 Girish K S
2011-09-16 13:39 ` [PATCH V6 RESEND 1/2] mmc: core: Add power off notify feature(eMMC 4.5) Girish K S
2011-09-16 13:39 ` [PATCH V6 RESEND 2/2] mmc: core: Add Poweroff Notify handling eMMC 4.5 Girish K S
2011-10-10 23:09 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2011-10-11 4:59 ` Girish K S
2011-10-11 14:00 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2obxola02.fsf@bob.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=girish.shivananjappa@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.