From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] ARM: mx31: Print the silicon version
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2r58n91yn.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB7E496.4070400@denx.de> (Stefano Babic's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:40:38 +0200")
Hi Stefano,
> On 04/27/2011 11:11 AM, Detlev Zundel wrote:
>
>>>>> This is due to the usage of the const in the mx3_cpu_type:
>>>
>>> struct mx3_cpu_type {
>>> u8 srev;
>>> const char *v;
>>>
>>> Do you agree if I drop myself the const attribute on u-boot-imx before
>>> pulling your patch to the arm tree ?
>>
>> Sorry to jump in late,
>
> .. not so late, we can change it...
>
>>but why not change get_cpu_rev to 'const char *'
>> which it actually is?
>
> This is correct. However, I have not noted before that the last
> introduced get_cpu_rev() in MX31 is an exception in u-boot. For all
> other processors, it returns a u32 and it is defined as u32
> get_cpu_rev(void).
>
> Fabio's patch introduces a variant, because it is defined as const char
> *get_cpu_rev(void). I propose to change its name (get_cpu_rev_string ?)
> and add the static attribute, to make clear it is different as the
> get_cpu_rev() already implemented in u-boot.
I see. Can't we consolidate all those functions into more general
functions higher up in the specialization graph? I.e. why have static
non-conforming functions when we could have one generic function to
handle all users?
Cheers
Detlev
--
System going down at 1:45 this afternoon for disk crashing.
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 2:18 [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] ARM: mx31: Print the silicon version Fabio Estevam
2011-04-14 11:14 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2011-04-14 20:53 ` stefano babic
2011-04-15 18:07 ` Stefano Babic
2011-04-21 16:01 ` Stefano Babic
2011-04-27 9:11 ` Detlev Zundel
2011-04-27 9:40 ` Stefano Babic
2011-04-27 13:16 ` Fabio Estevam
2011-04-27 14:00 ` Stefano Babic
2011-04-27 14:57 ` Detlev Zundel [this message]
2011-04-27 16:01 ` Stefano Babic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2r58n91yn.fsf@ohwell.denx.de \
--to=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.